TCFD / Strategy
Strategy
The impacts of climate change create both systemic risks and opportunities for value creation within our portfolio and investment strategy. In a changing and uncertain global environment, with shifting regulatory requirements, record-breaking extreme weather events, and the significant growth of sectors such as AI and green energy, disrupting products and services, future-proofing our portfolio, establishing the right mitigation, and identifying value creation opportunities are priorities for our business.
Building on the development of Oakley’s work on climate, we updated our climate change risk assessment and scenario analysis for our 2024 portfolio. Oakley worked with a specialist consultant to conduct an outside-in assessment, using a top-down approach to identify key physical and transition risks and opportunities across Oakley’s four sectors – Technology, Education, Consumer and Business Services – followed by a bottom-up approach to account for specific company nuances. This enabled a bespoke portfolio analysis to generate more targeted strategic insights.
Defining climate-related risks and opportunities
Oakley has identified the following climate-related risks and opportunities over the short, medium, and long term:
Physical risks
Physical climate risks and opportunities arise from changes in climate patterns and extreme weather events that impact a company’s assets, employees and value chain. Both acute and chronic physical risks were assessed:
Acute events
Immediate extreme weather events such as drought, flash floods and wildfires
Chronic events
Long-term variability of weather patterns and changes to the climate system such as rising sea levels
Transition risks
Transition risks are driven by the policy, legal, technological and market changes that are required to transition to a low carbon economy, which can disrupt operations and asset values across sectors. These risks will vary, particularly in the short term, depending on local policy responses and stakeholder pressure, while in the long-term, transition drivers are expected to have global implications through the re-alignment towards a low-carbon economy.
Physical and transition risks are often interconnected, with the impacts of one influencing the emergence or severity of the other. In many cases, transition risks can arise as a direct response to physical climate risks – such as rising insurance premiums in regions with high exposure to extreme weather events.
Policy and legal risk
Risks arising from current or future climate-related policies, regulations or legal actions that may affect operations, compliance costs or asset values. For example, carbon pricing, reporting requirements and exposure to litigation.
Technology risk
Risks associated with the emergence of new technologies that support the transition to a low-carbon economy. For example, the substitution of existing products and services with low emission options.
Market risk
Risks driven by shifting market dynamics, such as changing consumer preferences, investor expectations, or supply chain adjustments related to decarbonisation.
Reputational risk
Risks linked to negative stakeholder perceptions due to a company’s environmental performance or lack of action in relation to climate-related factors.
Transition opportunities
The transition to a low-carbon economy and the actions required to mitigate and adapt to the impacts of climate change can incentivise innovation and create opportunities for businesses. Identifying and capitalising on low-carbon transition opportunities is strategically important for maintaining competitiveness in a decarbonising economy.
Resource efficiency
Opportunities to reduce operating costs and improve productivity through more efficient energy consumption, modes of transport and distribution, as well as use of materials, water and other resources.
Markets
Access to new market opportunities, locations and sustainability-linked financing.
Products and services
Innovation or expansion of products and services that support the transition to a low-carbon economy in line with consumer expectations and regulatory shifts.
Understanding the interdependencies is an important element in assessing the full spectrum of climate-related risks and opportunities, therefore this assessment accounted for the causality of each risk and opportunity together to identify effective mitigation measures and business opportunities.
Climate risk assessment and scenario analysis methodology
This year's climate risk assessment began with the identification of a comprehensive list of potential physical and transition risks to our portfolio companies, both in relation to the location of their direct operations and, where material, risks within their supply chain. The long list of identified risks and opportunities was then prioritised against a structured scoring system based on the likelihood and severity on a scale of 1 to 5, tailored to the unique characteristics of each portfolio company.
To assess physical risk, we focused on the geolocation of each portfolio company’s physical assets to assess the exposure to acute and chronic climate events. In cases where supply chain exposure was deemed significant, supplier locations were also assessed.
Transition risks were evaluated based on external drivers including regulatory developments, sector-specific trends, technological advancements, and shifts in investor and consumer expectations. This analysis was conducted using an outside-in approach, enabling us to group risks at the sector or fund level.
To explore the potential future impacts of the identified priority risks and opportunities, we modelled two forward-looking climate scenarios across three time horizons to 2030, 2040 and 2050. However, this report contains the results for the 2030 and 2050 time horizons as the 2040 time horizon showed limited variation in the results,
Orderly scenario
Assumes global temperature increase reaches 1.5°C or 2°C in by 2100 as a result of the implementation of robust climate policies – including stricter regulation and rising energy prices – technological innovation, and increasing demands for sustainable products and services. Under this scenario we also considered implications for capital access, including the rise of ESG-linked loans and investor climate-aligned requirements.
Hothouse world scenario
Assumes global temperature rise to 3°C or 4°C with limited global action taken to mitigate climate change, resulting in continuously increasing GHG emissions, higher physical climate impacts, severe social and economic disruptions and more frequent extreme weather events. This scenario assumes little to no change in current policy trends and insufficient decarbonisation efforts.
The 2030 time horizon aligns with Oakley’s typical holding period and marks a key milestone year in global climate commitments made to reduce carbon emissions. The 2040 and 2050 horizons allow Oakley to have a longer-term view when evaluating future exits or new investments. However, due to global uncertainty and data limitations, these scenarios were only assessed for selected risks and opportunities.
This integrated risk assessment and scenario analysis has enabled Oakley to identify and model the most material climate-related risks and opportunities in our portfolio based on exposure. Where sufficient data was available, we evaluated potential financial impacts that can inform decision-making and resilience planning for our portfolio companies.
To ensure a strategic robust response to the firm’s identified risks – particularly those related to the low-carbon transition – Oakley’s Sustainability, Legal, Risk and Compliance teams work closely together to implement risk mitigation measures where needed.
Climate risk assessment results
Overall, Oakley’s portfolio exposure to climate-related risks remains low across all scenarios, reflecting our investment strategy focus on sectors and geographies with low-to-average carbon intensity. Nevertheless, we view this analysis as an important input to our ongoing investment strategy, decision-making and risk management processes – particularly as we approach key climate inflection points in the coming decades. The results of our climate risk assessment and scenario analysis indicate that transition risks are significantly more pronounced under low-emissions scenarios aligned with 1.5°C or 2°C, particularly at 2030. In contrast, physical risks show limited divergence across scenarios in the short term, but increase substantially in the high-emissions scenarios as the analysis extends to 2040 and beyond.
Performing the scenario analysis allows us to better understand the potential impacts of climate change on our investments and inform our approach to mitigate identified risks, including physical and transition risks. Our approach aims to be proactive in order to mitigate climate value-at-risk before it becomes material. Key physical risks across the portfolio include heat stress, increased cooling demand and volatility in electricity pricing, as well as more localised risks such as flash flooding and high wind events in specific regions. We are also monitoring transition-related risks such as regulatory change, insurability of assets, and potential disruptions to infrastructure.
In parallel, the analysis has identified a number of climate-related opportunities. These include the deployments of on-site renewable energy (e.g. solar generation) to reduce energy cost exposure, access to capital through ESG-aligned financing mechanisms, and the potential to generate new revenue streams through low carbon products and services.
Scenario analysis heat map
2030 | 2050 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Orderly scenario | Hothouse world | Orderly scenario | Hothouse world | ||
Physical risks | Riverine & coastal flooding | ||||
Flash flooding | |||||
Extreme Wind (Europe only) | |||||
Wildfire (Europe only) | |||||
Tropical cyclone (2050) | |||||
Heat stress | |||||
Asset insurability | |||||
Disruption to IT infrastructure | |||||
Physical opportunities | Supply chain resilience | ||||
Transition risks | ESG reporting compliance | ||||
Cooling costs | |||||
Electricity price | |||||
Energy efficiency regulation | |||||
Transition opportunities | Resource efficiency | ||||
Circularity | |||||
Low carbon products / services | |||||
Low emission energy sources | |||||
ESG -linked loans | |||||
Key
Very low | Low | Medium | High | Very high | Not assessed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Climate risk assessment matrices
The summary matrices below provide an overview of the most material climate-related risks and opportunities, aggregated at the sector level, while the heat map demonstrates the level of risk across scenarios and, where applicable, time horizons. Risk scores are relative to Oakley’s portfolio context, and do not represent absolute exposure levels. In 2025, the Sustainability Team will engage with portfolio companies to better understand how these risks and opportunities are relevant to their operations.
Material risks and opportunities
Business services
Risk
R1. Energy consumption and cooling costs
R2. Direct Carbon Pricing (ETS)
R3. Workforce disruption
R4. Environmental reporting obligations
Opportunity
O1. Low carbon products and services
O2. Resource efficiency
O3. Circularity
O4. Energy price resilience
O5. Supply chain optimisation
O6. ESG linked loans
Material risks and opportunities
Consumer
Risk
R1. Workforce disruption
R2. Resource scarcity
R3. Indirect price increases from suppliers
R4. Manufacturing disruption
R5. Asset damage
R6. Supply chain routedisruption
R7. Asset insurability
R8. Environmental reporting obligations
R9. Restrictions on energy use
R10. Volatile energy prices
R11. Carbon pricing (ETS)
R12. Asset disruption
Opportunity
O1. Alternative materials / Circularity
O2. Energy price resilience
O3. Low-emission fuels
O4. Resource efficiency
O5. Low carbon products and services
O6. Supply chain resilience
Material risks and opportunities
Education
Risk
R1. Volatile energy prices
R2. Asset damage
R3. Carbon pricing (ETS)
R4. Efficiency regulation
R5. Heating/cooling requirements
R6. Environmental regulations
R7. Workforce disruption
R8. Infrastructure damage
Opportunity
O1. Low-emissions fuels
O2. Competitive differentiation
O3. ESG-linked loans
O4. Energy price resilience
Material risks and opportunities
Technology
Risk
R1. Integration of energyefficient technology
R2. Energy consumption and cooling costs
R3. Disruption to data centres / servers from high temperatures
Opportunity
O1. Energy price resilience
O2. Resource efficiency
O3. Minimisation of impact through durable design
O4. Energy efficient production and distribution services
O5. Low carbon products and services
O6. ESG-linked loans
Firm operations and climate strategy
Oakley’s direct operational exposure to physical climate risks remain limited, as we operate from five office locations across Europe and primarily source business and professional services. However, we recognise the firm still has a role to play in minimising our carbon footprint and environmental impact. In 2024, Oakley grew to 219 employees, a 30% increase from 2023, which we see as an opportunity to implement greater operational efficiencies aligned with our sustainability ambition.
We have measured our operational carbon footprint annually since 2019, improving data quality and the scope of calculations every year. In 2024, we developed our first climate strategy for decarbonisation and navigating climate risks. This process involved a detailed review and refinement of our emissions data, helping us improve data quality, remove double counting, and identify key emissions hotspots.
As climate risk management continues to evolve across the private markets industry, Oakley remains committed to working alongside peers to accelerate progress. For more information on our industry collaborations, please see our collaborations.